№4-2023

https://doi.org/10.53939/15605655/2023_4_30

Sadyrova А.

Abstract. The existence of the orphan’s institution is an urgent problem of humanity and this reality, in turn, tends to generate, as a rule, negative consequences for the individual, society and the state that cannot be fully resolved for a long time. Orphans care require not just sympathy and compassion, but also extremely interested activity on the part of the whole society. Such a conclusion will not be an exaggeration if the public is aware of and takes into account the degree of severity, risks and threats from «failed lives», since children socializing outside the institution of the family do not exist separately, in a closed space (as a certain group of people assumes). They are an indisputable element of society, influencing the level of its fullness no less than children who entered the world thanks to family upbringing. The problem is aggravated by the fact that society itself, in its current cultural and ideological state, does not quite objectively and humanely perceive this problem. The article provides a theoretical analysis of concepts that try to explain the reasons for the rejection of the society of children from orphanages, the emergence of difficulties in building relationships with them, as well as their ineffective socialization.
Keywords: pupil; orphan; anomie; discrimination; victimization; socialization.

References
1 Sotsial’naya zashchita detei. Deti-siroty i deti, ostavshiesya bez popecheniya roditelei. – Rezhim dostupa URL: https://bala.stat.gov.kz/deti-siroty-i-deti-ostavshiesya-bez-popecheniya-roditelej/ – (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2021).
2 Dal’ V. Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka, tt. 1-4. – M., 1978 (reprint izd. 1880-1884).
3 Anomiya // Bol’shaya rossiiskaya ehntsiklopediya. – Rezhim dostupa URL: https://bigenc.ru/sociology/ text/695311 – (data obrashcheniya: 29.11.2021).
4 Lippman U. Obshchestvennoe mnenie. – M., 2004. – 384 s.
5 Shmidt V. Grazhdanskii kontrol’ za detskimi domami: komu i zachem on nuzhen? – Rezhim dostupa URL: https://hro.org/node/1934 – (data obrashcheniya: 02.12.2021).
6 Giddens EH. Sotsiologiya. – M.: Ehditorial URSS, 1999. – 704 s.
7 Bol’shoi tolkovyi sotsiologicheskii slovar’ (Collins). T. 1 (A-O): Per. s angl. – M.: Veche, AST, 1999. – 544 s.
8 Gilinskii YA.I. Sotsiologiya deviantnogo povedeniya kak spetsial’naya sotsiologicheskaya teoriya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 1991. -№4. – S. 72-73.
9 Klachkova O.A. Strukturnaya organizatsiya viktimnoi lichnosti: disS…. kand. psikhol.kh nauk: 19.00.01. Komsomol’sk-na-Amure, 2008. -155 s.
10 Brownmiller S. Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster. – 1975. – P. 472.
11 Snyder J., Brooker M., Patrick M. R., Snyder A., Schrepferman L., & Stoolmiller M. Observed Peer Victimization During Early Elementary School: Continuity, Growth, and Relation to Risk for Child Antisocial and Depressive Behavior. Child Development. – 2003. -74(6). – Pp. 1881-1898.
12 Slyusarevskii N.N. Subkul’tura kak ob”ekt issledovaniya // Sotsiologiya: Teoriya, metody, marketing. – Kiev, 2002. -№3. – S. 117-127.
13 Bekova EH.K. Profilaktika vosproizvodstva sotsial’nogo sirotstva. Dis. kand. ped. nauk: 13.00.01 / EH.K. Bekova. – Yaroslavl’, 2007. – 227 s.
14 Bandura A. Teoriya sotsial’nogo naucheniya. – SPb.: Evraziya, 2000. – 320 s.